Feature Comparison

When building React Native applications, it may not be immediately clear when to choose Jest, Maestro, or Harness for your testing needs. Each framework serves different purposes and excels in different scenarios. This feature comparison provides additional context across key testing dimensions to aid in your decision-making process.

Quick Summary

Framework	Best For	Key Strength	Main Limitation
Harness	Native module testing with Jest-like syntax	Real device execution + familiar APIs	Beta stage, smaller ecosystem
Jest	Unit testing, component testing, JavaScript logic	Mature ecosystem, fast execution, excellent mocking	No native module access, Node.js only
Maestro	End-to-end UI testing across platforms	Simple YAML syntax, cross-platform UI testing	UI-dependent, limited mocking, indirect testing

Detailed Feature Comparison

Speed & Performance

Framework	Speed Ranking	Typical Execution Time	Key Performance Factor
Jest	Fastest	Seconds to minutes	No build required, runs in Node.js
Harness	Medium	~5-20 minutes total	Requires app build + device execution
Maestro	Slowest	Variable, UI-dependent	UI automation overhead, complex flows

Mocking

Framework	Mocking Capability	Key Features
Jest	Comprehensive	Automatic/manual mocking, extensive spy APIs
Harness	Native-focused	Jest-compatible APIs + real native module mocking
Maestro	Limited	No built-in mocking, workarounds required

Execution Environment

Framework	Environment	Native Access	Key Advantage
Jest	Node.js	Everything mocked	Fast, isolated JavaScript testing
Harness	Real devices	Full native modules	Production-like environment
Maestro	Real devices	Via UI interaction	Real device capabilities

Use Case Recommendations

Choose Harness when:

✅ You need to test native modules with real device access
✅ You want Jest-like syntax but with native capabilities
✅ Testing platform-specific functionality (camera, biometrics, etc.)
✅ You're comfortable with beta software
✅ Your team is familiar with Jest but needs native access

Choose Jest when:

✅ Testing JavaScript/TypeScript business logic
✅ Unit testing React Native components
✅ You need mature tooling and extensive ecosystem
✅ Fast feedback cycles are critical
✅ Testing doesn't require real native modules

Choose Maestro when:

✅ End-to-end UI testing is your primary need
✅ Testing user journeys across platforms
✅ You need simple, declarative test syntax
✅ Testing integrations between multiple apps
✅ Visual validation is important

Conclusion

Harness fills a unique gap in the React Native testing ecosystem by combining Jest's familiar developer experience with real native environment execution. While Jest excels at JavaScript testing and Maestro dominates UI testing, Harness is the only solution that lets you test native modules directly with familiar APIs.

Choose based on your primary testing needs, but consider that the most robust testing strategies often combine multiple approaches to ensure comprehensive coverage across all layers of your React Native application.

Need React or React Native expertise you can count on?

Let's talk

#Feature Comparison

#Quick Summary

#Detailed Feature Comparison

#Speed & Performance

#Mocking

#Execution Environment

#Use Case Recommendations

#Choose Harness when:

#Choose Jest when:

#Choose Maestro when:

#Conclusion